Legal Opinion

Miller Ex Rel. Yeager v. Snipes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1971No. 7121SC517PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

To recover for injuries inflicted by a domestic animal, a plaintiff must allege and prove: (1) That the animal was dangerous, vicious, mischievous, or ferocious, or one termed in law as possessing a vicious propensity;»and (2) that the owner or keeper knew or should have known of the animal’s vicious propensity, character, and habits. Swain v. Tillett, 269 N.C. 46, 152 S.E. 2d 297; Sellers v. Morris, 233 N.C. 560, 64 S.E. 2d 662; Patterson v. Reid, 10 N.C. App. 22, 178 S.E. 2d 1.

In support of their motion for summary judgment defendants offered evidence tending to show that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. National Screen Service Corporation v. The Poster Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  4. Samuel Blanken & Co., Inc. v. Shannon & Luchs CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  5. Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Snipes v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Troxler v. Charter Mandala Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Truesdale v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API