Miller Ex Rel. Yeager v. Snipes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Judge.
To recover for injuries inflicted by a domestic animal, a plaintiff must allege and prove: (1) That the animal was dangerous, vicious, mischievous, or ferocious, or one termed in law as possessing a vicious propensity;»and (2) that the owner or keeper knew or should have known of the animal’s vicious propensity, character, and habits. Swain v. Tillett, 269 N.C. 46, 152 S.E. 2d 297; Sellers v. Morris, 233 N.C. 560, 64 S.E. 2d 662; Patterson v. Reid, 10 N.C. App. 22, 178 S.E. 2d 1.
In support of their motion for summary judgment defendants offered evidence tending to show that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- National Screen Service Corporation v. The Poster Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Samuel Blanken & Co., Inc. v. Shannon & Luchs CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Snipes v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Troxler v. Charter Mandala Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Truesdale v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.