Durham v. Vine
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
The question presented is whether the trial judge erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In general, summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, answers to interrogatories, affidavits and admissions show that no material issue of fact exists and the movant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Yount v. Lowe, 288 N.C. 90, 215 S.E. 2d 563 (1975); Stonestreet v. Motors, Inc., 18 N.C. App. 527, 197 S.E. 2d 579 (1973).
In order for the defendant to prevail on his motion, he must establish the absence of any material issue of fact. He may meet…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Robinson v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Yount v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Gladstein v. South Square AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Kennedy v. Guilford Technical Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Furr v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Spector United Employees Credit Union v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Southerland v. KappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.