Haithcock v. Chimney Rock Company
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Judge.
The purpose of the Summary Judgment procedure provided by Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure is to ferret out those cases in which there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and in which, upon such undisputed facts, a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The burden is upon the moving party to establish the lack of a triable issue of fact. The test is whether the moving party, by affidavit or otherwise, presents materials which would require a directed verdict in his favor if presented at trial. Pridgen v. Hughes, 9 N.C. App. 635, 177 S.E. 2d 425. If the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Powell v. DEIFELLS, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Waters v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Redding v. FW Woolworth CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Robinson v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Hillman v. United States Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Peterson v. Winn-Dixie of Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Coakley v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.