Legal Opinion

Racine v. Boege

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 22, 1969No. 6912SC458PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The sole question presented is whether the trial court erred in entering judgment of nonsuit. In passing on this question it is elementary that all the evidence which tends to support plaintiff’s claim must be taken as true and must be considered in the light most favorable to him, resolving all contradictions and discrepancies in his favor and giving him the benefit of every reasonable inference which may legitimately be drawn therefrom. Clarke v. Holman, 274 N.C. 425, 163 S.E. 2d 783.

Plaintiff alleged that defendant was negligent in several respects, including that he drove his vehicle at a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. ScheldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Dunlap v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Clarke v. HolmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Powell v. CrossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Beaman v. . DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Griffeth v. WattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Campbell v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Curry v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Campbell v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API