Ballenger v. Crowell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
A motion for summary judgment may be granted only when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Lambert v. Duke Power Co., 32 N.C. App. 169, 231 S.E. 2d 31 (1977). All evidence before the court must be construed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. The slightest doubt as to the facts entitles the non-moving party to a trial. Miller v. Snipes, 12 N.C. App. 342, 183 S.E. 2d 270, cert. denied 279 N.C. 619, 184 S.E. 2d 883 (1971). It is only in the exceptional negligence case that the rule should be…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Hargett v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Glover v. First Union National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Young v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.