Legal Opinion
In re Mirsky
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 21, 2004No. 03-BG-374PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding against respondent Steven E. Mirsky,1 the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended to this court that reciprocal, but not identical, discipline be imposed in the form of a six-month suspension. No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
On June 18, 2002, the Court of Appeals of Maryland (“Maryland Court”) suspended respondent by consent2 for a period of ninety days. On April 15, 2003, after receiving notice of this discipline, Bar Counsel notified this court. We suspended respondent pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re AimarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re KrameDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re Yolanda M. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019