Legal Opinion

In re Aimar

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2007No. 06-BG-537Published

1Per curiam

In this reciprocal disciplinary proceeding against respondent, Don Aimar,1 the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended that we impose the reciprocal and identical discipline of a six-month and one-day suspension, with the suspension stayed pending a one-year term of probation subject to the conditions imposed by the Supreme Court of Nevada, and that the stayed suspension run nunc pro tunc from March 29, 2006, the effective date of the Nevada discipline. No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.

On March 29, 2006, the Supreme Court of Nevada…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API