Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1968No. 40844, 40865PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY Justice.

The principal question for decision in this consolidated cause is the constitutionality of H.B. 953 of the Twenty-Sixth Legislature, S.L. 1957, p. 109. This act, which bears an emergency clause, became law on May 21, 1957. It provides in substance that the county attorney, county judge and sheriff of each county of the state having a population of not less than 20,000 nor more than 20,400 as shown by the last preceding federal decennial census, and an assessed valuation of at least $15,-000,000.00 shall receive, in addition to their regular annual salaries fixed by general…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Barrett v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Herndon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Roberts v. LedgerwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. York v. TurpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Grand River Dam Authority v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API