Legal Opinion

Herndon v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1933No. 24165PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action involves a protest against the payment of the salary of F. W. Herndon, judge of the superior court of Garfield county.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial below. Plaintiffs, as taxpayers of Garfield county, filed with the county clerk of said county their protest to the payment of the salary of any of the officials of said superior court of said county for the reason that the law creating said office, being House Bill No. 175, S. L. 1915 (c. 20) or section 3102, O. O. S. 1921, is unconstitutional in that said laws is a local and special law and violates…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Amos v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. People Ex Rel. Griffin v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  4. Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Hawes v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. City of Sand Springs v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. WarramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API