Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 7, 1939No. 26895PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This case is presented to us on appeal from the district court of Tulsa county. It was instituted on the 20th day of June, 1935, by Otto Barrett and Blanch Barrett, as plaintiffs, against the board of county commissioners, the county treasurer, and county assessor of Tulsa county.

The plaintiffs sought to prevent by injunction the imposition and collection of an additional or supplemental assessment proposed to be made against their land by reason of its situation in what is known as Park View drainage district, No. 2, of Tulsa county. On August 2, 1935, the plaintiffs filed an amended…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Fair School Finance Council of Oklahoma, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Texas Oklahoma Express v. SorensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Wall v. MaroukSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API