Legal Opinion
Grand River Dam Authority v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 11, 1982No. 55755PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The single first-impression issue in this case is whether the Attorney General, when issuing formal written opinions, is governed by the Administrative Procedures Act, 75 O.S.Supp.1978 § 301 et seq. We hold that he is not and affirm the ruling of the district court dismissing the action for lack of venue.
Appellant, Grand River Dam Authority, is a conservation and reclamation district. Appellee, the Attorney General, issued Opinion No. 80-51, which construed appellant’s authority, powers, rights, duties and obligations under its enabling legislation, 82 O.S.1981 §§ 861-890.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lathrop v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Oklahoma Ass'n for Equitable Taxation v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Arco Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.