Legal Opinion
Haas v. Brandvold
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 2, 1988No. C1-87-1746PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Loyd Brandvold appeals a default judgment granted to Wallace Haas which renewed the ten year statute of limitations for bringing an action on a 1976 judgment Haas received against Brandvold. Haas noticed review of denial of a motion for attorney fees and costs.
We affirm.
FACTS
On September 8, 1976, Haas received a money judgment against Brandvold. On September 2, 1986, six days before the ten year statute of limitations expired, Haas served Brandvold with a summons and complaint commencing an action to renew the 1976 judgment. Brandvold did not interpose an answer or any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Recruiters, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Schultz v. OldenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Francis v. KnerrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Hotchkiss v. CuttingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Tharp v. TharpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Estate of SangrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Wise v. BixCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Koski v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Shamrock Development, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.