Hotchkiss v. Cutting
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was commenced in the district court for Olmsted county to recover possession of certain real estate. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Gourt.-
MoMillaN, J.
This is an action to recover the possession of real estate. Both parties claim title from a common source. Ezra D. Cooper, who, it is admitted, was the owner in fee of the premises on the 31st of July, 1857, on which day, the evidence shows, he executed a mortgage on the premises to one Solomon Grimes, to secure the payment of a note of even date, for four hundred dollars, with interest, &c., twelve months after the date thereof. The mortgage was duly recorded on the same day. Default having been made by the mortgagor in payment of the mortgage debt, Grimes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kipp v. FullertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Ames v. SchurmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
- Catlin v. . BillingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Wells-Stone Mercantile Co. v. TruaxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hoag v. JeffersIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- Dakota Investment Co. v. SullivanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Haas v. BrandvoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.