Legal Opinion

Koski v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 23, 2013No. A12-2274PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant-tenant challenges the district court’s order granting respondent-landlord a writ of recovery of the premises. Appellant-tenant argues that (1) service of the summons was inadequate under Minn.Stat. § 504B.331; (2) respondent-landlord waived his termination notice by accepting rent payments from appellant-tenant; and (3) respondent-landlord’s termination of the tenancy was retaliatory under Minn. Stat. § 504B.285, subd. 2(1) (2012). We reverse because service of the summons was inadequate due to respondent-landlord’s failure to strictly comply with Minn. Stat.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Shawn Drewicke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
  3. State of Minnesota v. Bradley D. FordyceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API