Legal Opinion

Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of Minnesota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 1993No. C6-93-150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellants challenge the district court’s denial of their two motions to amend their complaint and the grant of summary judgment for respondents. Respondents cross-appeal, challenging the district court’s partial denial of summary judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

In December 1981, appellants Vesta State Bank and State Bank of Belview jointly purchased a lease investment package from respondents Independent State Bank of Minnesota (ISBM), Clayton Management, Inc. (Clayton), and Lease Resources Corporation (LRC). Under the lease package,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Warrick v. GironSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Kline Iron & Steel Co. v. Gray Communications Consultants, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API