Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellants challenge the district court’s denial of their two motions to amend their complaint and the grant of summary judgment for respondents. Respondents cross-appeal, challenging the district court’s partial denial of summary judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
In December 1981, appellants Vesta State Bank and State Bank of Belview jointly purchased a lease investment package from respondents Independent State Bank of Minnesota (ISBM), Clayton Management, Inc. (Clayton), and Lease Resources Corporation (LRC). Under the lease package,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Warrick v. GironSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Kline Iron & Steel Co. v. Gray Communications Consultants, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993