Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Oldenburg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 18, 1938No. 31,528PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Harry Strom, as guardian of the estate of defendant Lillie Oldenburg, appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate, as to his ward, a personal judgment entered against both defendants, Frank H. and Lillie Oldenburg, on July 28, 1931.

The facts are not in dispute. The named defendants are husband and wife and have lived and cohabited together as such over a period of more than 20 years (except as hereinafter noted) next prior to the time this matter came before the court on the guardian’s said motion. On June 1, 1927, they had, for full value, executed a note…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. HanscomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Lockway v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Champ v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Knox v. HaugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Lundberg v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. In Re Estate of MarsdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Parrish v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Peterson v. W. Davis & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Harrington v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API