Legal Opinion
National Recruiters, Inc. v. Toro Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 8, 1984No. CX-83-1168PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, Judge.
This case comes on appeal following a trial to the court on a claim by plaintiff-respondent National Recruiters, Inc. (National) for a placement fee for securing a new employee for appellant-defendant The Toro Company (Toro). Following an initial summary judgment order in favor of Toro, the trial court set the order aside and the case proceeded to trial, without a jury. After findings were entered for plaintiff, including an award for attorneys fees, this appeal followed. We affirm.
FACTS
In January 1981, Corlyn Paulsen was referred by.National Recruiters to interview for a senior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blattner v. ForsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T v. Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Fownes v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Barlow v. BudgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Remick v. ClousingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- James R. Anderson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Douglas County Dennis Nagle, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Viking Supply, a Subsidiary of Gerald F. Ogren, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. National Cart Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- City of Savage v. FormanekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Pieper, Inc. v. Land O'Lakes Farmland Feed, Llc, a Delaware Limited Liability CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.