Legal Opinion
Tharp v. Tharp
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 18, 1949No. 34,823PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magnet, Justice.
In an action to renew a judgment dated May 8, 1936, a summons and complaint were served on defendant on May 3, 1946. The venue of the summons was laid in the district court for Hennepin county, fourth judicial district. The summons reads as follows:
“You are hereby summoned to appear within twenty days after service of this summons * * * and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you in the sum of * * *. [Italics supplied.]
“G. F. Mantz,
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Oak Grove and Hennepin,
Minneapol…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peterson v. W. Davis & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Equity Farms, Inc. v. HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Flanery v. KushaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Lockway v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- First National Bank v. EstensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jacobson v. LeapSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- In Re SitarzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Haas v. BrandvoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn ParkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.