Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Thomas J. Obert Enterprises

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 1986No. C1-85-1645PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

In this case, involving a fall on a rollerskating rink, we hold the trial court properly submitted primary assumption of risk to the jury and, further, that the trial court did not prejudicially err in admitting certain evidence. We reverse the court of appeals’ contrary rulings.

On April 12, 1982, plaintiff-respondent Vera L. Wagner, age 57, fell while rollerskating at the skating rink of defendant-appellant Thomas J. Obert Enterprises. The rink itself is a large oval-shaped hardwood floor surrounded by a wall 3V2 feet high. There are three exits or openings in the wall,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Wenninger v. MuesingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Maras v. City of BrainerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Leo PIOTROWSKI; Katherine Piotrowski, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SOUTHWORTH PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. Hurst v. East Coast Hockey League, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Daly v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API