Legal Opinion
Maras v. City of Brainerd
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 22, 1993No. C8-92-1676, C1-92-1700PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Presiding Judge.
This appeal is from the district court’s denial of appellants’ motion for summary judgment. Appellants sought summary judgment on the grounds that the decedent’s trustee failed to plead a proper 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim and that they were entitled to qualified, official and discretionary immunity. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
On July 13, 1991, Brainerd police officer Thomas Pfingsten shot and killed Barry Peterson (Peterson).
Peterson and his wife Natalie (Mrs. Peterson) spent the evening of July 12, 1991 at two Brainerd bars. They left one…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Watson v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Valentine v. Bonneville Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Craighead v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Hassan v. City Of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Sok Kong v. City of BurnsvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.