Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Edward d. Mulally, Justice. *
This is an action to recover damages sustained by plaintiffs while passengers in defendant’s taxicab. The jury returned a ver- diet for the defendant. Plaintiffs moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. A new trial was ordered on the ground that the court committed an error of law in instructing the jury on two conflicting standards of care applicable to defendant, a common carrier. Defendant appealed from the order granting the new trial, claiming that the court had abused its discretion.
The accident occurred during…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Williams v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Flaherty v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.