Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1974No. 43861PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edward d. Mulally, Justice. *

This is an action to recover damages sustained by plaintiffs while passengers in defendant’s taxicab. The jury returned a ver- diet for the defendant. Plaintiffs moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. A new trial was ordered on the ground that the court committed an error of law in instructing the jury on two conflicting standards of care applicable to defendant, a common carrier. Defendant appealed from the order granting the new trial, claiming that the court had abused its discretion.

The accident occurred during…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Williams v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Flaherty v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API