Leo PIOTROWSKI; Katherine Piotrowski, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SOUTHWORTH PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Leo Piotrowski brought this diversity action against Southworth Products Corp. (“Southworth”) to recover for personal injuries he sustained while using a product manufactured by Southworth. The case was submitted to a jury on both strict liability and breach of implied warranty of fitness theories. The jury found only that Southworth had breached its implied warranty of fitness. The district court 1 entered judgment on the jury verdict, from which Southworth appeals. We affirm.
I
Piotrowski was an employee of S.B. Foot Tanning Company (the “Tanning Co.”) where he…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Armstrong v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- American Business Interiors, Inc. v. Haworth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Norma Maristuen, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Henrietta Sougstad, Deceased v. National States Insurance Company, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Swanstrom v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Block v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.