Legal Opinion

Hurst v. East Coast Hockey League, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 13, 2006No. 26222PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BURNETT:

Craig A. Hurst (Appellant) appeals the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of East Coast Hockey League, Inc.; Knoxville Cherokees Hockey, Inc., d/b/a Pee Dee Pride Jockey, and d/b/a Florence Pride Hockey (“Pride”); Florence City-County Civic Center Commission (“Commission”) d/b/a Florence City-County Civic Center (“Civic Center”); City of Florence; and County of Florence (collectively referred to as Respondents). We certified the case for review from the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant filed this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Perez v. McConkeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kennedy v. Providence Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  4. Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Ingersoll v. Onondaga Hockey Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Singleton v. ShererCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Snavely v. AMISUB of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Cole v. Boy Scouts of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Eadie v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Blanding v. Long Beach Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API