Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge
Respondents Richard A. and Sandy Myers (the Myers) sued appellant Hearth Technologies, Inc., i/k/a Heatilator, Inc., and respondent Energy Plus, Inc. for negligence and products liability. After a jury trial, the trial court denied directed verdict motions, and the jury found Hearth liable. Hearth moved for a new trial on several grounds, a new trial on damages, or for a remittitur. The trial court denied the motion. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1994 the Myers purchased a gas fireplace insert called a DVi-10 manufactured by Hearth from Energy Plus, which also installed it. Part…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Arthur Allen Hogenson v. Michael W. HogensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- In Re the Civil Commitment of RameyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- General Mills Operations, LLC v. Five Star Custom Foods, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.