Legal Opinion

Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 22, 2001No. C7-00-596PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge

Respondents Richard A. and Sandy Myers (the Myers) sued appellant Hearth Technologies, Inc., i/k/a Heatilator, Inc., and respondent Energy Plus, Inc. for negligence and products liability. After a jury trial, the trial court denied directed verdict motions, and the jury found Hearth liable. Hearth moved for a new trial on several grounds, a new trial on damages, or for a remittitur. The trial court denied the motion. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1994 the Myers purchased a gas fireplace insert called a DVi-10 manufactured by Hearth from Energy Plus, which also installed it. Part…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. Arthur Allen Hogenson v. Michael W. HogensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. In Re the Civil Commitment of RameyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. General Mills Operations, LLC v. Five Star Custom Foods, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API