Legal Opinion

Springrose v. Willmore

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1971No. 42833PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

The central issue for determination is whether the judicially-created doctrine of implied assumption of risk, as an absolute defense separate from contributory negligence, should be abolished. It arises out of an injury to a teen-age passenger in an automobile negligently operated by its teen-age driver — the claim of the injured passenger and her father against the driver and owner of the automobile having been denied solely on the ground that the passenger had assumed the risk of injury.

Assumption of risk has been conceptually distinguished according to its primary or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. McConville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Parker v. ReddenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  5. Peterson v. WT Rawleigh CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Blackburn v. DortaSupreme Court of Florida · 1977

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API