Legal Opinion
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 23, 2000No. C4-99-1570PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge
Appellant Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees’ Union, Local # 320 (the union) challenges the district court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration based on the court’s determination that James Felty was not entitled to the grievance procedures under the collective bargaining agreement (CBA). The district court found that, as articulated in Article 7, § 1 of the CBA, Felty was not a “permanent” employee of the County of St. Louis (the county), the arbitrability of contract coverage was a matter for the court, and as a non-permanent employee Felty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Johnson v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Brothers Jurewicz, Inc. v. Atari, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Churchill Environmental & Industrial Equity Partners, L.P. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Community Partners Designs, Inc. v. City of LonsdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Lueth v. City of GlencoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local 320 v. County of St. LouisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.