Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 1995No. C4-93-2270PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
Plaintiff, Kristin Johnson, commenced this action against her former employer, Piper Jaffray, Inc., asserting state statutory age and gender discrimination claims under the Minnesota Human Rights Act and also asserting a defamation claim. Maintaining that Johnson’s execution of a Uniform Application for Securities Registration required her to arbitrate her claims, Piper Jaffray moved for an order staying the action and for an order compelling Johnson to arbitrate. The district court denied Piper Jaffray’s motions, concluding that the parties had not agreed to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Johnson v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Superpumper, Inc. v. Nerland Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Armijo v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.