Legal Opinion
Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 1983No. C2-82-1395PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
This case comes to us on an appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration and raises the issue whether an auto insurer’s policy affords plaintiffs underin-sured motorist coverage. We conclude there is no coverage, hence nothing to arbitrate, and remand for trial of the remaining issues.
Lawrence Myers was a passenger in a car that struck a tree. He was fatally injured. The car was owned by Allison Stein, who was insured with respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. At the time of the accident, the car was being driven by still another person…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- American Motorist Insurance Co. v. SarvelaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.