Legal Opinion

Community Partners Designs, Inc. v. City of Lonsdale

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 14, 2005No. A04-1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Respondent (CPD) sued appellant city, contending that the city breached an agreement to pay for engineering services. Appellant moved to compel binding arbitration and stay the action, which the district court denied. Appellant brought this action arguing that the district court erred because a valid arbitration agreement exists, the city did not waive the agreement, and the dispute falls within the agreement. We reverse.

FACTS

On January 17, 2002, appellant contracted with respondent for engineering services. The contract addressed a variety of work and established a fee…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Grover-Dimond Associates, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Johnson v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Brothers Jurewicz, Inc. v. Atari, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Champion Auto Sales, LLC v. Polaris Sales Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Star Windshield Repair, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Byars v. Dart Transit CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  4. Coloplast A/S v. Caldera Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  5. Gonzalez v. Hoovestol Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API