Legal Opinion

Churchill Environmental & Industrial Equity Partners, L.P. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 2002No. C7-01-1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s order denying its motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration, arguing that the parties agreed to arbitrate both the merits of respondents’ claims and the parties’ threshold dispute regarding arbitra-bility of those claims. Because we conclude that the parties clearly intended to arbitrate the arbitrability of respondents’ claims, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Ernst & Young (E & Y) served as the independent auditor for Asche Transportation Services, Inc. (ATS), a trucking company. In that capacity, E & Y issued audit…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Prudential Lines, Inc., and Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. KILCHER v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Rodgers v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  4. Boehm v. VW Credit, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
  5. Byars v. Dart Transit CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API