Legal Opinion

Lueth v. City of Glencoe

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 2002No. C1-01-913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Appellant City of Glencoe (the city) challenges the district court’s denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction over respondent Daniel John Lueth’s motion to compel arbitration, which he brought after the city terminated his employment. We conclude that the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction to decide whether there existed an agreement between the parties to submit to arbitration, and we affirm the denial of the city’s motion. But we conclude that the district court exceeded its subject-matter jurisdiction when it decided that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Willis v. County of SherburneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. GRUNDTNER v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Hebert v. Winona CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  4. University of Minnesota v. WoolleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API