Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fruchtman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1978No. 47700PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

Plaintiff-insurer, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, appeals from an order of the trial court denying its motion to vacate an arbitrator’s award of damages for bodily injury to defendant-insured, Dr. Stanley Fruchtman. The claimed injuries arose out of an automobile accident allegedly caused by a “hit-and-run” motorist. Defendant-insured claims coverage for the injuries under the “uninsured motorists” liability provision of the policy issued by plaintiff. The issue presented is whether the existence-and-scope-of-coverage dispute between the parties was arbitrable.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. MorseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. In Re Arbitration Between Hennen & St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Lener v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Halseth v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Children's Hospital, Inc. v. Minnesota Nurses Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API