Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1951No. 13312_1PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

One argument in support of the petition for rehearing is based on the contention that the defendants below were entitled to ■a jury trial as a matter of federal constitutional -right. We say based on the contention, because such a trial was granted and evidence presented for many weeks before the court -and a jury. At the conclusion of the evidence, the trial court determined that there were no issues of fact to go to the jury. The question arose below upon a motion to strike findings of fact. The appellants contend that this is not a suit -in equity but an action at law…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Whitehead v. ShattuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Atlantis Development Corporation, Ltd. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. John G. & Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation v. DewhurstTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Beaulieu v. ElliottAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. K.D.F. v. RexTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Robert F. Ford, Jr. v. Exxon Mobil Chemical Company, a Division of Exxonmobil CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 2007

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API