Legal Opinion

Chancellor v. Chancellor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 1949No. 33745PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neal, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Oklahoma county allowing revival of a dormant judgment and substituting curator (guardian) as judgment creditor.

April 11, 1942, in a divorce action, commenced by R. P. Chancellor, defendant, Rosalie Chancellor on a cross-petition obtained a decree of divorce from said plaintiff and judgment for alimony in the sum of $1,200, payable in 40 monthly installments of $30 each, commencing May 1, 1942.

No payments were made on said judgment, and on February 2, 1948, the defendant, Rosalie Chancellor, filed in said cause a motion to revive the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hudson v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Hatten v. Interocean Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Tudor v. American Investment Co. of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Harrah State Bank v. School District No. 70Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Hi-Power Gasoline Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. Grant County BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. LindauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Klaus v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Stephens v. DraperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. State Ex Rel. Remy v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API