Legal Opinion
Continental Supply Co. v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 29, 1945No. 3057PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal primarily involves the relative rights of two mortgagees under their respective mortgages upon the mortgagor’s undivided interest in certain oil and gas leases. The facts and judgment of the trial court are stated in its reported decision (D.C., 52 F.Supp. 717), but a restatement here is deemed essential to a proper understanding of the questions for review.
On July 23, 1941, the appellee, H. G. Marshall, as owner of an undivided 8/32nds of the 7/8ths working interest in two oil and gas leases (sufficiently described as the Pensoneau and Whitehead leases,…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Duff v. KeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Davis v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Larry O. Hulsey, an Individual Larry O. Hulsey & Co., a Texas Corporation, Defendants-Third Party v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago, a National Banking Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HulseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- In re Penn Central Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.