Legal Opinion

Kalimian v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 18, 2001No. AC 20882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his appeal from the decision by the defendant zoning board of appeals of the city of Norwich (board), which granted the application by the *629defendant Steven Brenneisen for a variance from two zoning regulations. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that the evidence in the record supported the board’s finding that Brenneisen was entitled to a variance due to hardship and (2) imposed on the plaintiff the burden of proving that the record lacked a factual basis to support the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Jaser v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Kaeser v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Horace v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. Campion v. Board of AldermenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Sydoriak v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Jersey v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF DERBYConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. Dipietro v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API