Legal Opinion
Sydoriak v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 9, 2005No. AC 25738PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendants, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Prospect (board), Domenic Moschella, the chairperson of the board, and Maryann C. Anderson, the town clerk of Prospect, appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal of the plaintiff, Peter Sydoriak, from the board’s decision denying him a variance and remanding the matter to the board for it to impose reasonable conditions, if appropriate, to protect the health and safety of the town’s citizens. This was the third action between the parties to have come before the trial court involving the use…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Efthimiou v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Carnese v. MiddletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Quality Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilcox v. Webster Insurance, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Singhaviroj v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Wiacek Farms, LLC v. City of SheltonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Caruso v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.