Kaeser v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
This is an administrative appeal from the granting of a zoning variance. The issues presented are: (1) Within the context of the Stratford zoning regulations (a) does the word “livestock” mean more than one animal or can it mean a single animal as well; (b) can a horse reasonably be considered a “household pet”; and (2) can the intention to stable a “pleasure horse” serve as the basis for the hardship required in order to grant a zoning variance. We conclude that within the context of these regulations, “livestock” as a collective noun can mean a single animal as well as more than one animal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pinsky v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Thomason v. Chemical BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Jaser v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Hyllen-Davey v. Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Kalimian v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.