Legal Opinion
Dipietro v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 24, 2006No. AC 26166PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiff, Peter DiPietro, appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the city of Milford, upholding the cease and desist order issued by the assistant city planner. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly found that (1) (a) the city of Milford (city) had statutory jurisdiction to regulate use of the plaintiffs docks, (b) zoning regulation of the docks is not preempted by the state and (c) enforcement of the regulation did not exceed the city’s police power, and (2) there was an adequate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Upjohn Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Planning & Zoning Commission v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Campion v. Board of AldermenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Urbanowicz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clifford v. PLAN. AND ZON. COM'N OF ANSONIASupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Rapoport v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS STAMFORDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Loring v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Garlasco v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Dipietro v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.