Legal Opinion
Horace v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 21, 2004No. AC 24665PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Kevin E. Horace and Mindy S. Horace,1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Salem (board), granting the application by the defendant Todd Nechamen for a variance.2 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly concluded that (1) a legally cognizable hardship existed that permitted the board to grant a variance, (2) there was substantial evidence before the board of a legally cognizable hardship and (3) the board properly permitted…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Trumbull Falls, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Campion v. Board of AldermenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Hescock v. ZON. BD. OF APP. OF TOWN OF STONINGTONConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Sydoriak v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Jersey v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF DERBYConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.