Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Zupancic v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1991No. 89-734PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The central issue before this court is whether R.C. 5727.15(C),1 which classifies taxing districts into one(s) containing an electric company plant having production equipment with an initial cost exceeding $1 billion and ones containing a plant having such property under this amount, is permissible under the Ohio Constitution. For the reasons that follow, we answer this query in the affirmative.

As a threshold to our inquiry we are confronted with respondent’s assertion that relators have improperly invoked this court’s original jurisdiction. Therefore, we will determine the propriety of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Avon Lake City School District v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mixon v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Tanya Mixon, Denise Thomas, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. The State of Ohio and Michael White, Mayor of the City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Desenco, Inc. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lingo v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API