Legal Opinion
Mixon v. Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 30, 1999No. 98-3368PublishedCited by 300 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs in these two consolidated cases are voters and taxpayers of the Cleveland School District who seek to have Ohio Substitute House Bill 269 (“H.B.269”) declared unconstitutional.1 H.B. 269 *394changed the composition and number of the Cleveland School Board by allowing the Mayor of Cleveland to appoint a new school board for the Cleveland School District, consisting of Cleveland and four adjacent areas. Prior to this legislation, school district residents voted in a public election for school board members. Plaintiffs brought claims under (i) the Equal…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by300 opinions
- Fritz v. Charter Township of Com-StockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WingetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Kevin W. Ziegler v. Ibp Hog Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Cady v. Arenac CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Essex Hayward v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
295 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.