Legal Opinion

Desenco, Inc. v. City of Akron

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1999No. 98-162PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

Appellants challenge the statutes that allow for the establishment of joint economic development districts (“JEDDs”) on four constitutional grounds: (1) that the statutes improperly delegate the power to levy taxes, (2) that the statutes violate the Uniformity Clause of the Ohio Constitution, (3) that the statutes deny equal protection as guaranteed by the United States and the Ohio Constitutions, and (4) that the statutes violate due process as guaranteed by both Constitutions.

In 1993, the General Assembly adopted legislation that allowed for the creation of JEDDs in order to facilitate…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Mixon v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Tanya Mixon, Denise Thomas, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. The State of Ohio and Michael White, Mayor of the City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Simmons-Harris v. GoffOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Yajnik v. Akron Department of Health, Housing DivisionOhio Supreme Court · 2004

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API