State ex rel. Butler v. Demis
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.
It is well established that in order for a writ of mandamus to issue, the relators must show the following:
“ ‘ (1) that they have a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, (2) that respondents are under a clear legal duty to perform the acts, and (3) that relators have no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law.’ ” State, ex rel. Akron Fire Fighters, v. Akron (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 448, 450.
If relators have a plain and adequate remedy at law, a writ of mandamus will not issue. However, the question remains whether a plain and adequate remedy at law is available to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. RushSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Knox County Council v. State Ex Rel. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- People Ex Rel. Conn v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Ney v. NiehausOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Dayton Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 44 v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.