Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Butler v. Demis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1981No. Nos. 80-550 and 80-1272PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.

It is well established that in order for a writ of mandamus to issue, the relators must show the following:

“ ‘ (1) that they have a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, (2) that respondents are under a clear legal duty to perform the acts, and (3) that relators have no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law.’ ” State, ex rel. Akron Fire Fighters, v. Akron (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 448, 450.

If relators have a plain and adequate remedy at law, a writ of mandamus will not issue. However, the question remains whether a plain and adequate remedy at law is available to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. RushSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  3. State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Knox County Council v. State Ex Rel. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People Ex Rel. Conn v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Ney v. NiehausOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Dayton Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 44 v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API