Legal Opinion

Avon Lake City School District v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1988No. Nos. 86-1117 and 86-2038PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants present two propositions of law. In the first, appellants contend that R.C. 5717.02 confers jurisdiction upon the BTA to hear a school district’s appeal from the valuation of personal property, and apportionment of the taxable value thereof, of a utility company. Second, appellants argue that the dismissals by the BTA deprive them of their right to due process of law under the Ohio and federal Constitutions. Appellees respond that the BTA’s decisions were correct concerning standing, and that a school board is not protected by the constitutional provisions which it asserts.

A…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Board of Education of the South-Western City Schools v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Delta Special School District No. 5 v. State Board of Education for the State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. City of Columbus v. NewOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Thaxton v. Medina City Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Professionals Guild of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Zupancic v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. City of Riverside v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. City of North Canton v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API