Legal Opinion

Scholl v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 4, 2002No. 00-737CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION 1

BASKIR, Judge.

Pending before the Court in this civilian back pay case, filed by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge David A. Scholl in 2000, is the Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which this Court may grant relief. Because we hold that Judge Scholl had a *641firm right — absent other factors which we will explore in further proceedings — to be reappointed as a U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the Plaintiffs complaint is properly before this Court. Thus, for the reasons stated below, the Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.

I.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Ainslie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API