Legal Opinion
In re United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 11, 2006No. Misc. No. 806PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
The United States petitions for a writ of mandamus under the Ml Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a).1 In its petition, the government challenges various rulings of the United States Court of Federal Claims in the case of Scholl v. United States, 61 Fed.Cl. 322 (Fed.Cl.). Ml proceedings in the Court of Federal Claims have been stayed pending our consideration of the petition.
This case involves a suit, purportedly under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1), by David A. Scholl, a former bankruptcy judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Metz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Mark Munns v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Peoples v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Schweitzer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.