Legal Opinion

Scholl v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 5, 2005No. 00-737CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BASKIR, Judge.

On July 12, 2005, the Plaintiff filed his Motion to compel the Defendant’s answer to Interrogatory 1 (First Motion); and his Motion to impose evidentiary consequences on the Defendant, overrule the Defendant’s objections to discovery, and compel answers to interrogatories (Second Motion). The Defendant filed its Combined Opposition to Plaintiffs discovery motions on August 25, 2005, which included a Renewed Motion for Certification of an Interlocutory Appeal. Plaintiff filed his Reply on September 19.

In their Joint Status Report (JSR), filed by the parties on August 19,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Merla J. Mullenberg v. United States of America, Department of Health & Human Services, and Dr. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Nwogu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. In Re U.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API