Scholl v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
On May 27, 2003, the Defendant filed a renewed Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). In its motion, the Defendant argues that the enactment of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Pub.L. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111 (CSRA), eliminated this Court’s authority to hear a back pay claim from the Plaintiff, Bankruptcy Judge David Scholl, an officer of the Judicial Branch. Following the filing of the second motion to dismiss by the Government, we held a hearing and directed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Semper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- In Re U.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006