Legal Opinion

Ainslie v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 6, 2003No. 01-106CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

This case was filed by a former Army National Guard technician seeking back pay stemming from the Department of Defense’s violation of 5 U.S.C. § 3329(b). As originally enacted, that section provided that military reserve technicians who had completed a designated period of service and were separated by reason of failing to serve in a military reserve component, “shall, if appropriate written application is submitted within 1 year after the date of separation, be offered a position ... not later than 6 months after the date of the application.” Plaintiff did not receive…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kramer, Mark Lee v. Rumsfeld, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  2. Lawrence J. Ainslie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Woodruff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API